<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Collaborating Enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/are-you-collaborating-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/are-you-collaborating-enough/</link>
	<description>Eyes &#38; Ears on Media - Are You Tuned In?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Tay</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/are-you-collaborating-enough/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Tay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/?p=187#comment-943</guid>
		<description>@Jonathan: Thanks it's awesome to hear it being practically used by someone actually running a business! (ie not an academic, personal or "fan" collaboration eg Lost wiki). I'm prepping for a meeting tomorrow and realise that our meeting venue has no internet! Which means we'll be limited in our ability to collaborate "live". Argh.

@Oldskoolmark: I guess the scrutiny factor isn't an issue for me, but on the flipside, it'll encourage everyone to do their best work!

@Sham: I guess a wiki isn't interactive the way... social networks are interactive. But I'd say they're definitely collaborative. And hey, no academic understanding or learning of social media required! BTW I hadn't heard of Basecamp until Jonathan brought it up. Then I went to wiki it. So you're not alone! lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan: Thanks it&#8217;s awesome to hear it being practically used by someone actually running a business! (ie not an academic, personal or &#8220;fan&#8221; collaboration eg Lost wiki). I&#8217;m prepping for a meeting tomorrow and realise that our meeting venue has no internet! Which means we&#8217;ll be limited in our ability to collaborate &#8220;live&#8221;. Argh.</p>
<p>@Oldskoolmark: I guess the scrutiny factor isn&#8217;t an issue for me, but on the flipside, it&#8217;ll encourage everyone to do their best work!</p>
<p>@Sham: I guess a wiki isn&#8217;t interactive the way&#8230; social networks are interactive. But I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re definitely collaborative. And hey, no academic understanding or learning of social media required! BTW I hadn&#8217;t heard of Basecamp until Jonathan brought it up. Then I went to wiki it. So you&#8217;re not alone! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sham</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/are-you-collaborating-enough/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Sham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/?p=187#comment-936</guid>
		<description>As I have not gone through the academic understanding or learning of social media(it took me 5 secs to argued to myself if I should use new media, social media or social network!), it would not have been easy for me to identify Wiki or Basecamp or any other online tools to help with group collaborations. 

I have always had this thought that Wiki is a non-interactive and purely informational tool while I am not at all aware of Basecamp. 

Just my thoughts for now. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I have not gone through the academic understanding or learning of social media(it took me 5 secs to argued to myself if I should use new media, social media or social network!), it would not have been easy for me to identify Wiki or Basecamp or any other online tools to help with group collaborations. </p>
<p>I have always had this thought that Wiki is a non-interactive and purely informational tool while I am not at all aware of Basecamp. </p>
<p>Just my thoughts for now. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldskoolmark</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/are-you-collaborating-enough/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>oldskoolmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/?p=187#comment-929</guid>
		<description>I'm doing social media class now and using a wiki is a pretty big change for me (u can tell I'm old school). I think its the change of working style and it takes getting used to. Its great that we can all the see the info and the progress of the work done, but sometimes it just feels like its also a scrutiny of how far one has progressed. I guess some don;t like having their work looked at every step of the way but it really speeds things up. I would use it when time is tight and work needs to be churned out fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m doing social media class now and using a wiki is a pretty big change for me (u can tell I&#8217;m old school). I think its the change of working style and it takes getting used to. Its great that we can all the see the info and the progress of the work done, but sometimes it just feels like its also a scrutiny of how far one has progressed. I guess some don;t like having their work looked at every step of the way but it really speeds things up. I would use it when time is tight and work needs to be churned out fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kong</title>
		<link>http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/are-you-collaborating-enough/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquefrequency.wordpress.com/?p=187#comment-925</guid>
		<description>Prior setting up fabrikade, I was scouting around for a web service and platform in which the team can 'sit' around together to discuss, disseminate infos, set milestones and set tasks to individuals and manage our outsource. To collaborate, and easily get things done without meeting up in person as we have our own day commitments. I found Basecamp by 37Signals easily the best option for us.

We could have opt for a Wiki platform but Basecamp simply have necessary tools, ease of use and a worthy UI to get things done, for us. It's like using a Mac, minimal learning curve and we can start working on things, fast and now.

Google Docs for our writings and such. Web-based, great reliability (it's Google), the ability to share and edit by team. Not as powerful compared to MS's products but for online workers, their collaborative environment proved invaluable.

Both web services has some things in common that works for us. The ability to comment, share, edit and keep everyone involved synced. It's useless if they don't have these qualities as we might just go back to emails and meetups. It has that bit of social element and that's good. Cos u want feedbacks, suggestions or opinions.

I think it's easier to convince people to sign up with the services if the service itself is easy to use and understand. People are used to habits and man, they can be hard to break. Create a easy-to-understand process or click thrus to ya workmates so it takes much lesser time for them to soh around. It'll helped to take away the first-step techno phobia. hah.

The features and choices are out there so I think, focus on the value than technology. Will this work for our company/staff/users using it? Will it be able to streamline our workflows, resulted in less noise and yet produce the results we want? Stuffs liked that. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior setting up fabrikade, I was scouting around for a web service and platform in which the team can &#8217;sit&#8217; around together to discuss, disseminate infos, set milestones and set tasks to individuals and manage our outsource. To collaborate, and easily get things done without meeting up in person as we have our own day commitments. I found Basecamp by 37Signals easily the best option for us.</p>
<p>We could have opt for a Wiki platform but Basecamp simply have necessary tools, ease of use and a worthy UI to get things done, for us. It&#8217;s like using a Mac, minimal learning curve and we can start working on things, fast and now.</p>
<p>Google Docs for our writings and such. Web-based, great reliability (it&#8217;s Google), the ability to share and edit by team. Not as powerful compared to MS&#8217;s products but for online workers, their collaborative environment proved invaluable.</p>
<p>Both web services has some things in common that works for us. The ability to comment, share, edit and keep everyone involved synced. It&#8217;s useless if they don&#8217;t have these qualities as we might just go back to emails and meetups. It has that bit of social element and that&#8217;s good. Cos u want feedbacks, suggestions or opinions.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s easier to convince people to sign up with the services if the service itself is easy to use and understand. People are used to habits and man, they can be hard to break. Create a easy-to-understand process or click thrus to ya workmates so it takes much lesser time for them to soh around. It&#8217;ll helped to take away the first-step techno phobia. hah.</p>
<p>The features and choices are out there so I think, focus on the value than technology. Will this work for our company/staff/users using it? Will it be able to streamline our workflows, resulted in less noise and yet produce the results we want? Stuffs liked that. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
